<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What Do You Need To Do At Fifty? You Need Your Colonoscopy: No Ifs, Ands, Or Butts! by Patricia L. Raymond, MD, FACP, FACG</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.journalofnursingjocularity.com/2010/03/01/what-do-you-need-to-do-at-fifty-you-need-your-colonoscopy-no-ifs-ands-or-butts-by-patricia-l-raymond-md-facp-facg/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.journalofnursingjocularity.com/2010/03/01/what-do-you-need-to-do-at-fifty-you-need-your-colonoscopy-no-ifs-ands-or-butts-by-patricia-l-raymond-md-facp-facg/</link>
	<description>The Free Magazine for Nursing Humor, Jokes, Cartoons and more!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 16:38:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: BethAmy Clouse</title>
		<link>http://www.journalofnursingjocularity.com/2010/03/01/what-do-you-need-to-do-at-fifty-you-need-your-colonoscopy-no-ifs-ands-or-butts-by-patricia-l-raymond-md-facp-facg/comment-page-1/#comment-126</link>
		<dc:creator>BethAmy Clouse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 06:20:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.journalofnursingjocularity.com/?p=3107#comment-126</guid>
		<description>Sorry...when you&#039;re fat, you get more than your share of &quot;obese patient body habitus incompatible with optimal viewing results&quot; aka you doctors can&#039;t seem to try &amp; view my brain the long way around (&amp; after the &quot;cleansing,&quot; you SHOULD be able to see through my eyes backwards). Also, we see, &quot;Pt. obese, noncompliant with positioning.&quot; No one stops to think when you have a double wide on a single wide cold slab of procedural table, repositioning takes a bit more time, which is not allotted, hence, it&#039;s blame the pt. time as schedules (as well as the @$$e$ of a lot of folks in your profession) are tight &amp; don&#039;t allow the necessary time. After all, they ARE fat. So it&#039;s their fault you have to do a half-@$$ job on a double @$$ person. Providing you survive this malpositioning &amp; body habitus nightmare without being perforated (in a chart review of C-scopes one place I worked, fat people were perforated at an alarming rate - &amp; blamed thoroughly, via &quot;karma medicine,&quot; for the problem), you can then be informed, if you end up with positive biopsy results, that it&#039;s your own d****d fault you have colon cancer. You can be sure that, like all obese cancer pts., you are going to get the short end of the C-scope on pain &amp; nausea control, &amp; absolutely no sympathy. You may be otherwise pretty much heterosexual, monogamous, faithful, hard working, caring, but, you&#039;re fat, so you deserve the disease &amp; the pi$$poor medical tx that go with obesity.
The real risk obesity poses to healthcare is that fat people don&#039;t want to go to doctors to be told if they follow a 1000 cal diet &amp; exercise 4 hr or more per day, they will then, if this regimen actually results in sustained weight loss, be treated like a human being - i.e., your diseases will be treated with something other than a diet sheet, appt. with a dietitian, list of gyms to hit (for more apparently well-deserved public humiliation), &amp; the inevitable &quot;fat lecture.&quot; You will, they promise, get antibiotics for infections instead of diets. If you get sick, they&#039;ll treat you with compassion. BUTT: Since the regimen stalls metabolism (I know, trust me), the promised weight loss rarely occurs. Even if it does, you WERE fat, &amp; therefore, even if you lose all the weight, IT&#039;S STILL YOUR FAULT YOU GOT SICK because you USED to be fat. The promised treat-you-like-a-human-being stuff doesn&#039;t materialize unless the doctor was never averse to fat people in the first place - in which case, they DON&#039;T think a diet sheet &amp; a list of gyms cures pneumonia. Those types of doctors are rare. Where they get figures that say doctors don&#039;t advise fat people to diet, exercise, &amp; lose weight, I don&#039;t know. That&#039;s all most fat people ever hear, &amp; it&#039;s the sum total of treatment for most obese people - who then go home &amp; eat because they&#039;re upset about being treated like they&#039;re worse than drug addicts who mug &amp; kill people for drugs, alcoholics who mug people for booze &amp; kill them by driving drunk, promiscuous people who spread drug-resistant &amp; carcinogenic STDs/AIDS/various forms of Hepatitis (esp. C, which can cause cancer), sex addicts/porn addicts who end up sometimes as rapists or even child molesters (added to the list for promiscuity), gambling addicts who leave families indebted &amp; starve their kids...why fat people &amp; smokers are considered so much more evil than these people, instead of victims of nicotine addiction or food addiction &amp; overdieting, has to be that we are not as physically attractive. These days, even doctors seem to hate fat people because we don&#039;t look attractive enough to inspire sexual responses (except for some ethnic groups).  At least, that seems to be the only differentiating factor between addiction to food &amp; addiction to other substances/processes.
In other words, we&#039;re too ugly to get good care; you can&#039;t put a bag over any ugly parts because there aren&#039;t bags large enough (even body bags don&#039;t come that large) to hide all of it. And since we&#039;re ugly, no one wants to look at us long enough to treat us. When forced to do so for chronic conditions &amp; things like cancer, doctors &amp; RNs flee the room to avoid looking at the Fat Ugly Patient any longer than necessary - leaving us hurting &amp; hurling (&amp; I&#039;ve worked oncology before; I&#039;ve heard the &quot;let them barf, maybe they&#039;ll finally lose weight&quot; thing enough to get really close to a rap for assault &amp; battery from the sincere desire to b***h slap the body ho across the unit). 
Body Nazis control the world. The war is on. And they don&#039;t really intend to let us get thin, or the public humiliation at the gym, pushing people off bikes &amp; skates, running them off jogging tracks/trails, trying to run them over by jumping the curb to get their ugly fat @$$e$ off the sidewalk, jumping on their heads while they&#039;re swimming laps to take it over (or holding you under water long enough to drown you) while the lifeguard laughs, would not happen. So, we&#039;re all getting fatter. Maybe someday, we&#039;ll get angry enough to sit on the ones who treat us badly - might as well use that fat @$$ for something useful.
If you take a look at people, you&#039;ll find thin people are the most aggressive at all-you-can-eat buffets; they&#039;re the big winners in gluttony - oops, sorry, I mean eating - contests, out-munching fat people by a, well, sizeable margin. But apparently, it&#039;s OK to be a glutton if you&#039;re thin. But it&#039;s not OK to be fat even if you have no metabolism left &amp; 1200 cal a day means you simply don&#039;t gain more weight.
So, please tell me: What is the point in fat people seeking medical attention again? And above all, why in the world would we submit to a colonoscopy only to be subjected to substandard testing &amp; treatment for whatever&#039;s wrong? If we deserve it, why would you care if we bothered with the screening? Won&#039;t we die faster &amp; get out of your hair?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry&#8230;when you&#8217;re fat, you get more than your share of &#8220;obese patient body habitus incompatible with optimal viewing results&#8221; aka you doctors can&#8217;t seem to try &amp; view my brain the long way around (&amp; after the &#8220;cleansing,&#8221; you SHOULD be able to see through my eyes backwards). Also, we see, &#8220;Pt. obese, noncompliant with positioning.&#8221; No one stops to think when you have a double wide on a single wide cold slab of procedural table, repositioning takes a bit more time, which is not allotted, hence, it&#8217;s blame the pt. time as schedules (as well as the @$$e$ of a lot of folks in your profession) are tight &amp; don&#8217;t allow the necessary time. After all, they ARE fat. So it&#8217;s their fault you have to do a half-@$$ job on a double @$$ person. Providing you survive this malpositioning &amp; body habitus nightmare without being perforated (in a chart review of C-scopes one place I worked, fat people were perforated at an alarming rate &#8211; &amp; blamed thoroughly, via &#8220;karma medicine,&#8221; for the problem), you can then be informed, if you end up with positive biopsy results, that it&#8217;s your own d****d fault you have colon cancer. You can be sure that, like all obese cancer pts., you are going to get the short end of the C-scope on pain &amp; nausea control, &amp; absolutely no sympathy. You may be otherwise pretty much heterosexual, monogamous, faithful, hard working, caring, but, you&#8217;re fat, so you deserve the disease &amp; the pi$$poor medical tx that go with obesity.<br />
The real risk obesity poses to healthcare is that fat people don&#8217;t want to go to doctors to be told if they follow a 1000 cal diet &amp; exercise 4 hr or more per day, they will then, if this regimen actually results in sustained weight loss, be treated like a human being &#8211; i.e., your diseases will be treated with something other than a diet sheet, appt. with a dietitian, list of gyms to hit (for more apparently well-deserved public humiliation), &amp; the inevitable &#8220;fat lecture.&#8221; You will, they promise, get antibiotics for infections instead of diets. If you get sick, they&#8217;ll treat you with compassion. BUTT: Since the regimen stalls metabolism (I know, trust me), the promised weight loss rarely occurs. Even if it does, you WERE fat, &amp; therefore, even if you lose all the weight, IT&#8217;S STILL YOUR FAULT YOU GOT SICK because you USED to be fat. The promised treat-you-like-a-human-being stuff doesn&#8217;t materialize unless the doctor was never averse to fat people in the first place &#8211; in which case, they DON&#8217;T think a diet sheet &amp; a list of gyms cures pneumonia. Those types of doctors are rare. Where they get figures that say doctors don&#8217;t advise fat people to diet, exercise, &amp; lose weight, I don&#8217;t know. That&#8217;s all most fat people ever hear, &amp; it&#8217;s the sum total of treatment for most obese people &#8211; who then go home &amp; eat because they&#8217;re upset about being treated like they&#8217;re worse than drug addicts who mug &amp; kill people for drugs, alcoholics who mug people for booze &amp; kill them by driving drunk, promiscuous people who spread drug-resistant &amp; carcinogenic STDs/AIDS/various forms of Hepatitis (esp. C, which can cause cancer), sex addicts/porn addicts who end up sometimes as rapists or even child molesters (added to the list for promiscuity), gambling addicts who leave families indebted &amp; starve their kids&#8230;why fat people &amp; smokers are considered so much more evil than these people, instead of victims of nicotine addiction or food addiction &amp; overdieting, has to be that we are not as physically attractive. These days, even doctors seem to hate fat people because we don&#8217;t look attractive enough to inspire sexual responses (except for some ethnic groups).  At least, that seems to be the only differentiating factor between addiction to food &amp; addiction to other substances/processes.<br />
In other words, we&#8217;re too ugly to get good care; you can&#8217;t put a bag over any ugly parts because there aren&#8217;t bags large enough (even body bags don&#8217;t come that large) to hide all of it. And since we&#8217;re ugly, no one wants to look at us long enough to treat us. When forced to do so for chronic conditions &amp; things like cancer, doctors &amp; RNs flee the room to avoid looking at the Fat Ugly Patient any longer than necessary &#8211; leaving us hurting &amp; hurling (&amp; I&#8217;ve worked oncology before; I&#8217;ve heard the &#8220;let them barf, maybe they&#8217;ll finally lose weight&#8221; thing enough to get really close to a rap for assault &amp; battery from the sincere desire to b***h slap the body ho across the unit).<br />
Body Nazis control the world. The war is on. And they don&#8217;t really intend to let us get thin, or the public humiliation at the gym, pushing people off bikes &amp; skates, running them off jogging tracks/trails, trying to run them over by jumping the curb to get their ugly fat @$$e$ off the sidewalk, jumping on their heads while they&#8217;re swimming laps to take it over (or holding you under water long enough to drown you) while the lifeguard laughs, would not happen. So, we&#8217;re all getting fatter. Maybe someday, we&#8217;ll get angry enough to sit on the ones who treat us badly &#8211; might as well use that fat @$$ for something useful.<br />
If you take a look at people, you&#8217;ll find thin people are the most aggressive at all-you-can-eat buffets; they&#8217;re the big winners in gluttony &#8211; oops, sorry, I mean eating &#8211; contests, out-munching fat people by a, well, sizeable margin. But apparently, it&#8217;s OK to be a glutton if you&#8217;re thin. But it&#8217;s not OK to be fat even if you have no metabolism left &amp; 1200 cal a day means you simply don&#8217;t gain more weight.<br />
So, please tell me: What is the point in fat people seeking medical attention again? And above all, why in the world would we submit to a colonoscopy only to be subjected to substandard testing &amp; treatment for whatever&#8217;s wrong? If we deserve it, why would you care if we bothered with the screening? Won&#8217;t we die faster &amp; get out of your hair?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

